Showing posts with label TV news channels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TV news channels. Show all posts

Sunday, October 18, 2015

Freedom: Is this the India we want?

I am writing this on the morning of 2nd October.  Gandhiji’s favourite hymns and bhajans are playing in the background.  Later in the day, the film Gandhi will be shown on television, just as it is shown every year this day. 

The day’s newspaper carries the screaming headline: the family of the man who was lynched for eating beef demands CBI probe, and eight families flee the village where he was living.  The irony is inescapable.

Is this the India Gandhiji would have wanted to see?  Is this the India you and I want? 

Over the last few months, there have been several instances of intolerance and superstitious practices that have made headline news.  No doubt, there are regional issues at play in the occurrence of each of these incidents, but taken collectively, they are indicative of the hypocrisy and misplaced sense of importance ascribed to certain matters that we hold dear.

Yes, go-raksha is important, but don’t we also come across several abandoned cows roaming our streets, blocking traffic, sitting in filth, and eating garbage?  If we were genuinely concerned about the animal’s well-being, there would not be a single stray cow in our urban areas. 

Why should the culinary habits of certain communities affect our sentiments so much anyway?  How different is the imposition of beef ban from ‘non-believers’ being forced to refrain from eating in public during the fasting month in middle-eastern countries? 

Besides, why confine your daya to the cow only?  Doesn’t Sanatana Dharma consider every living being to be an aspect of the divine?  Therefore, shouldn’t we be saving all animals; dogs, cows, donkeys, buffaloes, and birds in cages from a life of bondage and abuse?

A prominent weekly magazine recently reported that in a southern state – where animal sacrifice during religious festivals is rampant – there has been a spate of human sacrifices.  At least two individuals – a man and a child – were found murdered with their throats slit, and the paraphernalia of ritual worship were lying all around them. 

In another harrowing incident, this time in another southern state, a mother who went looking for her missing son, was shocked to find his body parts in her neighbour’s house.  The man had enticed the child into entering his house and carried out the deed.  Vigilantes later caught hold of the man and attempted to burn him. 

I can almost visualize the missionary exhorting his gullible audience: “Is this the kind of religion that you want to belong to?  Give up your barbaric faith, you heathen, and repent while you can!  Join the only true path and save your souls!!”


Hold on Mr Missionary.  Let’s look at what your brethren from a northeastern state have been up to.  Members of a certain NGO have apparently taken it upon themselves to “cleanse the society of homosexuals”.  As part of the anti-LGBT drive, volunteers have pledged to go door-to-door to “bring them back” to “proper culture”.  Further, they said, “we believe in God; as per our teachings, homosexuality is a wrongful deed, we want males to be like males and females to be like females.”

Over the last few months, as many as three rationalists have been shot dead, allegedly for publicly airing their opinions.  The fact that dissent and debate have been time-honoured components of free speech in India doesn’t seem to matter anymore.  Or perhaps, this must be a sign of emasculation; if you are unable to counter the rationalist’s view with a sane counter-argument, get rid of the source of the problem itself. 

Why does somebody else’s culture, dietary habits, sexuality and opinions rankle us so much?  Are we so insecure that differences such as these should erode our sense of acceptance, tolerance and peaceful coexistence? 

If our culture, religion and society do not evolve, and instead rigidly hold on to pietistic and deadwood practices, we would be in serious danger of turning into Taliban-land.  Or an ISIS-controlled state.  And that is the last thing we would ever want.  Before it is too late, we need to shun the narrowness, the hypocrisy, the superstition, and the intolerance.

Speaking of hypocrisy, the media should also accord equal importance to misdemeanours committed by adherents of all faiths.  Focusing entirely on the antics of a few fringe elements of the majority religion takes the attention away from the fruitful work that the present government is carrying out, which is so much better than that of the previous ridiculous government.  And the same request goes out to the 'civil' society of India, authors included.

So, to answer the question, this is not the India I want.  I want my religion and country to be free in every sense of the word.  How about you?   




Image sources:

http://www.livemint.com/rf/Image-621x414/LiveMint/Period1/2015/03/04/Photos/bee-kKrH--621x414@LiveMint.jpg

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Gay_Pride_Flag.svg/261px-Gay_Pride_Flag.svg.png

Monday, June 23, 2014

Satire: Breaking news!

Yes, we have moved ahead since the days of good old Doordarshan newscasts.  Back then, a rose-bedecked Salma Sultan would read out sedately from a prepared script in front of her, with hardly any visuals supplementing what she was reading out.


Then came the teleprompters, and anchors would read the news from the screen in front, without having to look up and down from their scripts.  I remember one of the viewers complaining through his letter that reading from teleprompters made anchors appear to have stiff necks, as they did not move their necks up and down!  But now teleprompters are the norm, of course.  As also visuals - supplied by travelling cameramen and on-field correspondents.

The studio anchor interviews the on field correspondent, who then interviews another correspondent, or comments on the goings on behind her.  There are so many questions and answers relayed back and forth that it can become exhausting - and pointless.  The only option then would be to zap them - with the remote - thank god for this invention!  Works very well with that other telly abomination as well: K-serials.

Sometimes the entire newscast is broadcast from a particular place of topical importance.  There was such a telecast in UK, when global warming was an issue - the anchors were standing in a distant mountainous area with a backdrop of melting mountain snow!  What for?  Won't we get the picture if the same visuals could be projected while the anchor speaks from the studio?  How much money did the channel spend on this arrangement?  By transporting the anchors and setting up the equipment in such a remote area, did they not ironically contribute to global warming?

The other irritating aspect of news channels these days, especially Indian ones, is the panel discussions.  First of all, they get more panelists than their air time would allow, and then the anchor interrupts them so many times, that hardly any point is put across by any one panelist, hardly any conclusion reached in the end.  Grrr...either increase the time allotted for your program or reduce the number of panelists.

Another very irritating behaviour by anchors: neverrrrrr ending questions... Or poly-thematic questions - asking about two or more issues in the same question.  An example would sound like: "what were you doing in 1987, why did you do it and what impact has this had on your career and your family life: did it improve your prospects at work and your love life, or were you left to fend for yourself?"  

Err... could you repeat that please?  

And if these sort of questions are asked to a panelist far away, with a time delay on the phone, then you, dear viewer, are in for some serious entertainment: 

"what were you doing in 1987..." 

"I had just finished the course and..."

...why did you do it and what...

...I had started a part time job at... sorry?

...yeah, why did you do it and what impact has this had on your career...

...yes, I am coming to that...where was I....yes, the part time job...what?...

...you career and your family life...

...family life...well let's see...

...did it improve your prospects at work and your love life...

...family was in India at the time and... sorry, love what?...

...your love life... did it improve or were you left to fend for...

...family... love... oh get off me!

Yet another irritant: introducing the interview standing right next to the anchor prior to starting the interview.  "Well, we are here with so and so, who in 1992 was the first person to jump off a plane and do a perfect somersault before landing on his mother-in-law's barbecue!  Now let's talk to him about his..." (okay, I made the scene up, but you get the picture).

The studio anchor has just told us the whole scenario, why repeat the entire thing before talking to the person?  Just get on with the questions!

And then there is...

Breaking news!  A celebrity sneezed today: how's that for news that could affect your life endlessly?  One of the channels also has a scheduled breaking news segment!  The only thing breaking would be the TV screen when you chuck the remote at it!

Sensationalist headlines: Bomb blast rocks Chennai!  You later find out that the blast was on a localized railway track, and a handful of passengers were injured - the rest of the VAST city went on its business as usual.  But no, in news language, Chennai was rocked!

Can we have DD and Salma Sultan back please...yes, yes, even without the rose is fine!


Image sources:
http://www.indyarocks.com/blog/50650/Doordarshan-turns-50
http://thiruvananthapuramupdates.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/3.jpg

Hinduism for the ignorant

Hinduism is the most ancient religion in the world that has survived an onslaught of colonial subjugation, bigoted misinterpretation, and ev...